The proposed rule amendment sets is intended to set forth a citation violation to address the failure of a designated physician in a pain management clinic to submit required data.

 

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH

Board of Medicine

RULE NO.:RULE TITLE:

64B8-8.017Citation Authority

PURPOSE AND EFFECT: The proposed rule amendment sets is intended to set forth a citation violation to address the failure of a designated physician in a pain management clinic to submit required data.

SUMMARY: The proposed rule amendment set forth a citation violation in the amount of $1,000 for failure of a designated physician in a pain management clinic to submit data required by Section 458.3265(2)(j)2., F.S. The rule amendment also requires the submission of the delinquent data within 30 days.

SUMMARY OF STATEMENT OF ESTIMATED REGULATORY COSTS AND LEGISLATIVE RATIFICATION:

The Agency has determined that this will not have an adverse impact on small business or likely increase directly or indirectly regulatory costs in excess of $200,000 in the aggregate within one year after the implementation of the rule. A SERC has not been prepared by the Agency.

The Agency has determined that the proposed rule is not expected to require legislative ratification based on the statement of estimated regulatory costs or if no SERC is required, the information expressly relied upon and described herein: During discussion of the economic impact of this rule at its Board meeting, the Board concluded that this rule change will not have any impact on licensees and their businesses or the businesses that employ them. The rule amendment will actually reduce costs to physicians because the issuance of a citation is less costly than going through the regular disciplinary process. The rule will not increase any fees, business costs, personnel costs, will not decrease profit opportunities, and will not require any specialized knowledge to comply. This change will not increase any direct or indirect regulatory costs. Hence, the Board determined that a Statement of Estimated Regulatory Costs (SERC) was not necessary and that the rule will not require ratification by the Legislature. No person or interested party submitted additional information regarding the economic impact at that time.

Any person who wishes to provide information regarding a statement of estimated regulatory costs, or provide a proposal for a lower cost regulatory alternative must do so in writing within 21 days of this notice.

RULEMAKING AUTHORITY: 456.077, 458.309 FS.

LAW IMPLEMENTED: 456.072(2)(d), 456.077 FS.

IF REQUESTED WITHIN 21 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS NOTICE, A HEARING WILL BE SCHEDULED AND ANNOUNCED IN THE FAR.

THE PERSON TO BE CONTACTED REGARDING THE PROPOSED RULE IS: André Ourso, J.D., M.P.H., Executive Director, Board of Medicine/MQA, 4052 Bald Cypress Way, Bin # C03, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3253.

 

THE FULL TEXT OF THE PROPOSED RULE IS:

Offenses enumerated in this rule may be disciplined by the issuance of a citation. The citation shall include a requirement that the licensee correct the offense, if possible, within a specified period of time, impose whatever obligations will correct the offense, and impose the prescribed penalty.

(1) through (2) No change.

(3) The following violations with accompanying penalty may be disposed of by citation with the specified penalty:

VIOLATIONS	PENALTY
(a) through (r) No change.
(s) Failure of designated physician in pain management clinic to submit the data required by Section 458.3265(2)(j)2., F.S. (Section 458.331(1)(g), F.S.)	$1,000 fine and submission of the delinquent data within 30 days.

(4) through (5) No change.

Rulemaking Authority 456.077, 458.309 FS., Law Implemented 456.072(2)(d), 456.077 FS., History–New 12-30-91, Formerly 21M-20.017, Amended 11-4-93, Formerly 61F6-20.017, Amended 8-23-95, Formerly 59R-8.017, Amended 4-7-99, 1-27-00, 1-31-02, 1-12-03, 7-27-04, 2-7-05, 1-4-06, 7-3-06, 1-16-08, 12-22-09, 7-9-12,                         .

 

NAME OF PERSON ORIGINATING PROPOSED RULE: Rules Committee, Board of Medicine

NAME OF AGENCY HEAD WHO APPROVED THE PROPOSED RULE: Board of Medicine

DATE PROPOSED RULE APPROVED BY AGENCY HEAD: April 10, 2015

DATE NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULE DEVELOPMENT PUBLISHED IN FAR: April 24, 2015