The proposed amendment to Rule 12D-9.025 is necessary to reflect subsection 194.035(1), F.S., as amended by Section 4, Chapter 2020-10, L.O.F.  

  •  

    DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE

    Property Tax Oversight Program

    RULE NO.:RULE TITLE:

    12D-9.025Procedures for Conducting a Hearing; Presentation of Evidence; Testimony of Witnesses

    PURPOSE AND EFFECT: The proposed amendment to Rule 12D-9.025 is necessary to reflect subsection 194.035(1), F.S., as amended by Section 4, Chapter 2020-10, L.O.F.

    SUMMARY: The proposed amendment to Rule 12D-9.025, F.A.C ., adds that an appraisal report cannot be submitted as evidence or considered by the value adjustment board or any special magistrate if the appraisal was performed by a person who serves as a special magistrate in the same county for the same tax year. And, the board and any special magistrate cannot admit such an appraisal report into evidence or consider such report during the same tax year.

    SUMMARY OF STATEMENT OF ESTIMATED REGULATORY COSTS AND LEGISLATIVE RATIFICATION:

    The Agency has determined that this will not have an adverse impact on small business or likely increase directly or indirectly regulatory costs in excess of $200,000 in the aggregate within one year after the implementation of the rule. A SERC has not been prepared by the Agency.

    The Agency has determined that the proposed rule is not expected to require legislative ratification based on the statement of estimated regulatory costs or if no SERC is required, the information expressly relied upon and described herein: 1) no requirement for a SERC was triggered under Section 120.541(1), F.S.; and, 2) based on past experiences with activities for providing the public tax information and rules of this nature, the adverse impact or regulatory cost, if any, do not exceed nor would exceed any one of the economic analysis criteria in a SERC, as set forth in Section 120.541(2)(a), F.S.

    Any person who wishes to provide information regarding a statement of estimated regulatory costs, or provide a proposal for a lower cost regulatory alternative must do so in writing within 21 days of this notice.

    RULEMAKING AUTHORITY: 194.011(5), 194.034(1), 195.027(1), 213.06(1) FS.

    LAW IMPLEMENTED: 193.092, 194.011, 194.032, 194.034 FS.

    IF REQUESTED WITHIN 21 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS NOTICE, A HEARING WILL BE HELD AT THE DATE,TIME AND PLACE SHOWN BELOW(IF NOT REQUESTED, THIS HEARING WILL NOT BE HELD):

    DATE AND TIME: July 14, 2021, at 9:30 a.m.

    PLACE: 2450 Shumard Oak Boulevard, Building 2, Room 1220, Tallahassee, Florida 32399.

    Pursuant to the provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act, any person requiring special accommodations to participate in this workshop/meeting is asked to advise the agency at least 48 hours before the workshop/meeting by contacting: Mike Cotton at (850)617-8870.. If you are hearing or speech impaired, please contact the agency using the Florida Relay Service, 1(800)955-8771 (TDD) or 1(800)955-8770 (Voice).

    THE PERSON TO BE CONTACTED REGARDING THE PROPOSED RULE IS: Mike Cotton, Property Tax Oversight Program, telephone (850)617-8870 or email DORPTO@floridarevenue.com.

     

    THE FULL TEXT OF THE PROPOSED RULE IS:

     

    12D-9.025 Procedures for Conducting a Hearing; Presentation of Evidence; Testimony of Witnesses

    (1)    through (4)(f) No change.

    (g) An appraisal report shall not be submitted as evidence in a value adjustment board proceeding in any tax year in which the person who performed the appraisal serves as a special magistrate to that county value adjustment board for the same tax year. Accordingly, in that tax year the board and any special magistrate in that county shall not admit such appraisal report into evidence and shall not consider any such appraisal report.

    (5) through (10) No change.

    Rulemaking Authority 194.011(5), 194.034(1), 195.027(1), 213.06(1) FS. Law Implemented 193.092, 194.011, 194.032, 194.034, 194.035 FS. History–New 3-30-10, Amended 6-14-16, 9-19-17, xx-xx-xx.

     

    NAME OF PERSON ORIGINATING PROPOSED RULE: Mike Cotton

    NAME OF AGENCY HEAD WHO APPROVED THE PROPOSED RULE: Governor and Cabinet.

    DATE PROPOSED RULE APPROVED BY AGENCY HEAD: June 15, 2021

    DATE NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULE DEVELOPMENT PUBLISHED IN FAR: November 23, 2020

Document Information

Comments Open:
6/23/2021
Summary:
The proposed amendment to Rule 12D-9.025, F.A.C ., adds that an appraisal report cannot be submitted as evidence or considered by the value adjustment board or any special magistrate if the appraisal was performed by a person who serves as a special magistrate in the same county for the same tax year. And, the board and any special magistrate cannot admit such an appraisal report into evidence or consider such report during the same tax year.
Purpose:
The proposed amendment to Rule 12D-9.025 is necessary to reflect subsection 194.035(1), F.S., as amended by Section 4, Chapter 2020-10, L.O.F.
Rulemaking Authority:
194.011(5), 194.034(1), 195.027(1), 213.06(1) FS.
Law:
193.092, 194.011, 194.032, 194.034 FS.
Related Rules: (1)
12D-9.025. Procedures for Conducting a Hearing; Presentation of Evidence; Testimony of Witnesses