Description of the Walton County Coastal Construction Control Line  


  • RULE NO: RULE TITLE
    62B-26.001: Description of the Walton County Coastal Construction Control Line
    NOTICE OF CORRECTION
    Notice is hereby given that the following correction has been made to the proposed rule in Vol. 35 No. 28, July 17, 2009 issue of the Florida Administrative Weekly.

    The following notice was printed incorrectly in the July 17, 2009 issue of the Florida Administrative Weekly.

    The following language was inadvertently omitted from the notice:

    “The Metes and Bounds Description of the Coastal Construction Control Line of Walton County, Florida as published in the notice of proposed rulemaking remains unchanged.”

    The notice should read as follows

    Notice is hereby given that the following changes have been made to the proposed rule in accordance with subparagraph 120.54(3)(d)1., F.S., published in Vol. 35, No. 17, May 1, 2009 issue of the Florida Administrative Weekly.

    (1) There is hereby established, pursuant to Section 161.053, F.S., the revised Walton County Coastal Construction Control Line. The legal description of said line is attached hereto.

    (2) This rule amendment shall take effect on the date of filing with the Florida Department of State and shall be that it is duly recorded in the public records in the office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court, in and for Walton County, Florida, together with each affected municipality.

    (3) After this rule amendment becomes effective, a permit, under Section 161.053, F.S. and Chapter 62B-33, F.A.C., to alter, excavate or construct on property seaward of the established control line is required from the Department of Environmental Protection.

    Rulemaking Authority 161.053(21) 370.021(1) FS. Law Implemented 161.053 FS. History–New 5-13-75, Amended 12-29-82, Formerly 16B-26.01, 16B-26.001, Amended ________.

    “The Metes and Bounds Description of the Coastal Construction Control Line of Walton County, Florida as published in the notice of proposed rulemaking remains unchanged.”