The Board reviewed the rules as required by Executive Order 11-01 and proposes to repeal Rules 61G5-18.002, F.A.C., because it is not statutorily mandated; the proposed repeal of Rule 61G5-18.005, F.A.C., is necessary as it is not statutorily ...

DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION
Board of Cosmetology

RULE NO.: RULE TITLE:
61G5-18.002: Manner of Application
61G5-18.005: Examination Review Procedure
61G5-18.0055: Supervised Cosmetology Practice Exception
61G5-18.011: Initial Licensure or Registration Requirement for Instruction on Human Immunodeficiency Virus and Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome; Course Content and Approval Requirements
PURPOSE AND EFFECT: The Board reviewed the rules as required by Executive Order 11-01 and proposes to repeal Rules 61G5-18.002, F.A.C., because it is not statutorily mandated; the proposed repeal of Rule 61G5-18.005, F.A.C., is necessary as it is not statutorily authorized; Rule 61G5-18.005, F.A.C., is being repealed because it is unnecessary and duplicative of Section 477.019, F.S.
SUMMARY: As required by Executive Order 11-01, the rules were reviewed and are being repealed as they are not statutorily mandated; statutorily authorized; or duplicative of Section 477.019, F.S.
SUMMARY OF STATEMENT OF ESTIMATED REGULATORY COSTS AND LEGISLATIVE RATIFICATION:
The Agency has determined that this will not have an adverse impact on small business or likely increase directly or indirectly regulatory costs in excess of $200,000 in the aggregate within one year after the implementation of the rule. A SERC has not been prepared by the agency.
The Agency has determined that the proposed rule is not expected to require legislative ratification based on the statement of estimated regulatory costs or if no SERC is required, the information expressly relied upon and described herein: During discussion of the economic impact of this rule at its Board meeting, the Board, based upon the expertise and experience of its members, determined that a Statement of Estimated Regulatory Costs (SERC) was not necessary and that the rule will not require ratification by the Legislature. No person or interested party submitted additional information regarding the economic impact at that time.
Any person who wishes to provide information regarding a statement of estimated regulatory costs, or provide a proposal for a lower cost regulatory alternative must do so in writing within 21 days of this notice.
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY: 120.53, 455.217(2), 477.016, 477.019(4),(5) FS.
LAW IMPLEMENTED: 455.217(2), 477.019 FS.
IF REQUESTED WITHIN 21 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS NOTICE, A HEARING WILL BE HELD AT THE DATE,TIME AND PLACE SHOWN BELOW(IF NOT REQUESTED, THIS HEARING WILL NOT BE HELD):
DATE AND TIME:
PLACE:
THE PERSON TO BE CONTACTED REGARDING THE PROPOSED RULE IS: Robyn Barineau, Executive Director, Board of Cosmetology, 1940 North Monroe Street, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0783

THE FULL TEXT OF THE PROPOSED RULE IS:

61G5-18.002 Manner of Application.

Rulemaking Specific Authority 120.53, 477.016 FS. Law Implemented 477.019 FS. History–New 11-3-80, Amended 1-17-83, Formerly 21F-18.02, Amended 6-22-87, Formerly 21F-18.002, Amended 7-30-02, Repealed________.

 

61G5-18.005 Examination Review Procedure.

Rulemaking Specific Authority 477.016, 455.217(2) FS. Law Implemented 455.217(2) FS. History–New 11-3-80, Formerly 12F-18.05, Amended 8-20-90, Formerly 21F-18.005, Repealed________.

 

61G5-18.0055 Supervised Cosmetology Practice Exception.

Rulemaking Authority 477.016, 477.019(4) FS. Law Implemented 477.019(4), (5) FS. History–New 11-25-98, Amended 2-25-07, 5-19-09, 5-13-10, Repealed________.

NAME OF PERSON ORIGINATING PROPOSED RULE: Board of Cosmetology
NAME OF AGENCY HEAD WHO APPROVED THE PROPOSED RULE: Board of Cosmetology
DATE PROPOSED RULE APPROVED BY AGENCY HEAD: August 31, 2011