To repeal rules identified as no longer necessary and in conflict with existing statutory fee language.

 

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH

Division of Medical Quality Assurance

RULE NO.:RULE TITLE:

64B-1.016Fees: Examination and Post-Examination Review

PURPOSE AND EFFECT: To repeal rules identified as no longer necessary and in conflict with existing statutory fee language.

SUMMARY: The rule is being repealed as unnecessary and in conflict with existing statutory fee language governing individual health care professional licenses.

SUMMARY OF STATEMENT OF ESTIMATED REGULATORY COSTS AND LEGISLATIVE RATIFICATION: The Agency has determined that this will not have an adverse impact on small business or likely increase directly or indirectly regulatory costs in excess of $200,000 in the aggregate within one year after the implementation of the rule. A SERC has not been prepared by the Agency.

The Agency has determined that the proposed rule is not expected to require legislative ratification based on the statement of estimated regulatory costs or if no SERC is required, the information expressly relied upon and described herein: Based on the SERC checklist, this rulemaking will not have an adverse impact or regulatory costs in excess of $1 million within five years as established in Section 120.541(2)(a), F.S.

Any person who wishes to provide information regarding a statement of estimated regulatory costs, or provide a proposal for a lower cost regulatory alternative must do so in writing within 21 days of this notice.

RULEMAKING AUTHORITY: 456.004(5), (10), 456.017(1)(b), (2), (6), (7) FS.

LAW IMPLEMENTED: 456.004(10), 456.017(1), (2) FS.

IF REQUESTED WITHIN 21 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS NOTICE, A HEARING WILL BE SCHEDULED AND ANNOUNCED IN THE FAR.

THE PERSON TO BE CONTACTED REGARDING THE PROPOSED RULE IS: Adrienne Rodgers, 4052 Bald Cypress Way, Bin C-00, Tallahassee, FL 32399, [phone] or [e-mail].

 

THE FULL TEXT OF THE PROPOSED RULE IS:

 

64B-1-016 Fees: Examination and Post-Examination Review.

Rulemaking Authority 456.004(5), (10), 456.017(1)(b), (2), (6), (7) FS. Law Implemented 456.004(10), 456.017(1), (2) FS. History–New 3-14-02, Amended 7-20-03, 7-12-05, 1-23-07, 4-7-08, 6-29-09, 3-19-12.Repealed__________.

 

NAME OF PERSON ORIGINATING PROPOSED RULE: Adrienne Rodgers

NAME OF AGENCY HEAD WHO APPROVED THE PROPOSED RULE: John H. Armstrong, MD, FACS, Surgeon General and Secretary

DATE PROPOSED RULE APPROVED BY AGENCY HEAD: August 12, 2015