The Board proposes the repeal of the rules due to outdated or unnecessary language.  

  •  

    DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH

    Board of Dentistry

    RULE NO.: RULE TITLE:

    64B5-2.0125Examination Security

    64B5-2.0148Credentials Requirements for Applicants from Non-Accredited Schools or Colleges, Whose Records Are Unavailable

    64B5-2.022Examination Review

    PURPOSE AND EFFECT: The Board proposes the repeal of the rules due to outdated or unnecessary language.

    SUMMARY: The rules will be repealed due to outdated or unnecessary language.

    SUMMARY OF STATEMENT OF ESTIMATED REGULATORY COSTS AND LEGISLATIVE RATIFICATION:

    The Agency has determined that this will not have an adverse impact on small business or likely increase directly or indirectly regulatory costs in excess of $200,000 in the aggregate within one year after the implementation of the rule. A SERC has not been prepared by the Agency.

    The Agency has determined that the proposed rule is not expected to require legislative ratification based on the statement of estimated regulatory costs or if no SERC is required, the information expressly relied upon and described herein: During discussion of the economic impact of this rule at its Board meeting, the Board, based upon the expertise and experience of its members, determined that a Statement of Estimated Regulatory Costs (SERC) was not necessary and that the rule will not require ratification by the Legislature. No person or interested party submitted additional information regarding the economic impact at that time.

    Any person who wishes to provide information regarding a statement of estimated regulatory costs, or provide a proposal for a lower cost regulatory alternative must do so in writing within 21 days of this notice.

    RULEMAKING AUTHORITY: 456.017(1)(d) and (2), 466.004(4) FS.

    LAW IMPLEMENTED: 456.017(1)(d) and (2), 466.006 FS.

    IF REQUESTED WITHIN 21 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS NOTICE, A HEARING WILL BE SCHEDULED AND ANNOUNCED IN THE FAR.

    THE PERSON TO BE CONTACTED REGARDING THE PROPOSED RULE IS: Susan Foster, Executive Director, Board of Dentistry, 4052 Bald Cypress Way, Bin #C08, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3258.

     

    THE FULL TEXT OF THE PROPOSED RULE IS:

    64B5-2.0125 Examination Security.

    Rulemaking Authority 456.017(1)(d) FS. Law Implemented 456.017(1)(d) FS. History–New 3-25-90, Formerly 21G-2.0125, 61F5-2.0125, 59Q-2.0125, Repealed                                  .

     

    64B5-2.0148 Credentials Requirements for Applicants from Non-Accredited Schools or Colleges, Whose Records Are Unavailable.

    Rulemaking Authority 466.004(4) FS. Law Implemented 466.006 FS. History–New 11-16-89, Amended 10-18-90, Formerly 21G-2.0148, 61F5-2.0148, 59Q-2.0148, Amended 7-29-97, 12-26-06, 3-18-12, Repealed                            .

     

    64B5-2.022 Examination Review.

    Rulemaking Authority 456.017(2) FS. Law Implemented 456.017(2) FS. History–New 3-25-90, Formerly 21G-2.022, 61F5-2.022, 59Q-2.022, Repealed                         .

     

    NAME OF PERSON ORIGINATING PROPOSED RULE: Board of Dentistry

    NAME OF AGENCY HEAD WHO APPROVED THE PROPOSED RULE: Board of Dentistry

    DATE PROPOSED RULE APPROVED BY AGENCY HEAD: August 21, 2015

     

Document Information

Comments Open:
9/8/2015
Summary:
The rules will be repealed due to outdated or unnecessary language.
Purpose:
The Board proposes the repeal of the rules due to outdated or unnecessary language.
Rulemaking Authority:
456.017(1)(d) and (2), 466.004(4) FS.
Law:
456.017(1)(d) and (2), 466.006 FS.
Contact:
Susan Foster, Executive Director, Board of Dentistry, 4052 Bald Cypress Way, Bin #C08, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3258.
Related Rules: (3)
64B5-2.0125. Examination Security
64B5-2.0148. Credentials Requirements for Applicants from Non-Accredited Schools or Colleges, Whose Records Are Unavailable
64B5-2.022. Examination Review