The Commission proposes to repeal the rules after a comprehensive rule review because the rules are verbatim duplications of existing statutes and are unnecessary and duplicative.

 

DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES

State Retirement Commission

RULE NOS.:RULE TITLES:

60R-1.001Scope and Purpose

60R-1.0021Definitions

60R-1.0045Witness Fees

60R-1.0051Hearing Officers

60R-1.006Final Orders

60R-1.0061Correction of Orders and Rehearing

60R-1.007Judicial Review

PURPOSE AND EFFECT: The Commission proposes to repeal the rules after a comprehensive rule review because the rules are verbatim duplications of existing statutes and are unnecessary and duplicative.

SUMMARY: The rules are being repealed because they are verbatim duplications of existing statutes and are unnecessary and duplicative.

SUMMARY OF STATEMENT OF ESTIMATED REGULATORY COSTS AND LEGISLATIVE RATIFICATION: The Agency has determined that this will not have an adverse impact on small business or likely increase directly or indirectly regulatory costs in excess of $200,000 in the aggregate within one year after the implementation of the rule. A SERC has not been prepared by the Agency.

The Agency has determined that the proposed rule is not expected to require legislative ratification based on the statement of estimated regulatory costs or if no SERC is required, the information expressly relied upon and described herein: During discussion of the economic impact of this rule at the Commission meeting, the Commission determined that a Statement of Estimated Regulatory Costs (SERC) was not necessary and that the rule will not require ratification by the Legislature. The rule will not have any impact on the licensees and their businesses or the business that employ them. The rule imposes no additional regulation or costs on licensees. The rule will not increase any fees, business costs, personnel costs, will not decrease the profit opportunities, will not require any specialized knowledge to comply, and will not increase any direct or indirect regulatory costs.

Any person who wishes to provide information regarding a statement of estimated regulatory costs, or provide a proposal for a lower cost regulatory alternative must do so in writing within 21 days of this notice.

RULEMAKING AUTHORITY: 120.53(1), 121.031(1), 121.24 FS.

LAW IMPLEMENTED: 120.53, 120.57, 120.58, 120.59, 120.68, 121.22, 121.23, 121.24 FS.

IF REQUESTED WITHIN 21 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS NOTICE, A HEARING WILL BE SCHEDULED AND ANNOUNCED IN THE FAR.

THE PERSON TO BE CONTACTED REGARDING THE PROPOSED RULE IS: Carla McBride, Clerk, State Retirement commission, 4050 Esplanade Way, Suite 160, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0950

 

THE FULL TEXT OF THE PROPOSED RULE IS:

 

60R-1.001 Scope and Purpose.

Rulemaking Specific Authority 121.031(1) FS. Law Implemented 120.53 FS. History–New 3-30-76, Amended 1-12-78, Formerly 22J-1.01, 22J-1.001, Repealed__________.

 

60R-1.0021 Definitions.

Rulemaking Specific Authority 120.53(1) FS. Law Implemented 121.22, 121.24 FS. History–New 8-19-87, Formerly 22J-1.0021, Repealed____________.

 

60R-1.0045 Witness Fees.

Rulemaking Specific Authority 121.031(1) FS. Law Implemented 120.57, 120.58, 121.23, 121.24 FS. History–New 8-19-87, Formerly 22J-1.0045, Repealed____________.

 

60R-1.0051 Hearing Officers.

Rulemaking Specific Authority 121.031(1) FS. Law Implemented 120.57, 121.23, 121.24 FS. History–New 8-19-87, Section 22J-1.0051 was formerly subsection (13) of 22J-1.005, Formerly 22J-1.0051, Repealed__________.

 

60R-1.006 Final Orders.

Rulemaking Specific Authority 121.031(1) FS. Law Implemented 120.59, 121.23, Repealed____________.

 

60R-1.0061 Correction of Orders and Rehearing.

Rulemaking Specific Authority 121.031(1) FS. Law Implemented 120.57, 121.23 FS. History–New 8-19-87, Formerly 22J-1.0061, Repealed_____________.

 

60R-1.007 Judicial Review.

Rulemaking Specific Authority 121.031(1) FS. Law Implemented 120.68, 121.23 FS. History–New 3-30-76, Amended 1-12-78, 10-24-79, Formerly 22J-1.07, Amended 8-19-87, 8-12-91, Formerly 22J-1.007, Repealed___________.

 

NAME OF PERSON ORIGINATING PROPOSED RULE: State Retirement Commission

NAME OF AGENCY HEAD WHO APPROVED THE PROPOSED RULE: State Retirement Commission

DATE PROPOSED RULE APPROVED BY AGENCY HEAD: August 24, 2015