98-002973 Division Of Pari-Mutuel Wagering vs. Salvatore F. Lembo
 Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Monday, November 16, 1998.


View Dockets  
Summary: Assuming arguendo, but not ruling, that the statute defines a violation and provides a penalty, clear and convincing evidence of inhumane treatment/neglect of named greyhound was not proven.

1STATE OF FLORIDA

4DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS

8DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND )

13PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, )

16DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING, )

21)

22Petitioner, )

24)

25vs. ) Case No. 98-2973

30)

31SALVATORE F. LEMBO, )

35)

36Respondent. )

38)

39RECOMMENDED ORDER

41Upon due notice, this cause came on for formal hearing by

52telephonic conference call on October 19, 1998, before Ella Jane

62P. Davis, a duly assigned Administrative Law Judge of the

72Division of Administrative Hearings. Petitioner's counsel and

79witness were present in Tallahassee, Florida, at a different

88location than that of the Administrative Law Judge. Respondent,

97who testified on his own behalf, was present in Debuque, Iowa.

108APPEARANCES

109For Petitioner: Eric H. Miller

114Chief Assistan t General Counsel

119Department of Business and

123Professional Regulation

1251940 North Monroe Street

129Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1007

132For Respondent: Salvatore F. Lembro, pro se

1391900 Washington Street, Number 5

144Dubuque, Iowa 52001

147STATEMENT OF THE ISSUE

151Whether Respondent violated Section 550.2415(6)(a), Florida

157Statutes, and Rule 61D-6.002(1), Florida Administrative Code.

164PRELIMINARY STATEMENT

166This action was initiated by an administrative complaint

174filed by the Division of Pari-Mutuel Wagering on or about June 5,

1861998.

187Both counts of the administrative complaint contain a single

196allegation that Respondent neglected to provide humane treatment

204to a racing greyhound known as "Lobo Sable," resulting in severe

215ulcerous sores of the dog's skin. The only difference in the

226administrative complaint's two counts is that one count addresses

235Section 550.2415(6)(a), Florida Statutes, and the other count

243addresses the Rule 61D-6.002(1), Florida Administrative Code.

250Respondent timely requested formal hearing, and the cause

258was referred to the Division of Administrative Hearings on or

268about July 14, 1998. Pursuant to stipulation, formal hearing was

278conducted by a three-way telephonic conference call on

286October 19, 1998.

289Petitioner complied with the prehearing order by filing a

298prehearing statement and pre-filing exhibits. At formal hearing,

306Respondent stipulated that the facts as stated under Section C,

316paragraphs 1-8 of Petitioner's prehearing statement were

323admitted. These stipulated facts have been utilized as

331appropriate wi thin this Recommended Order.

337The parties agreed that the undersigned take official

345recognition of Petitioner's pre-numbered Exhibits 1 and 2.

353Petitioner's Exhibits 3 and 4 were ultimately admitted as joint

363exhibits of the parties. Petitioner's Exhibit 5 also was

372admitted in evidence. Petitioner presented the oral testimony of

381Dr. Lillian Plank, D.V.M. Respondent testified on his own

390behalf.

391No transcript was filed. All timely filed proposed findings

400of fact and conclusions of law have been considered in the

411preparation of this recommended order.

416FINDINGS OF FACT

4191. Petitioner is the State of Florida, Department of

428Business and Professional Regulation, Division of Pari-Mutuel

435Wagering. That Agency is charged with regulating the pari-mutuel

444wagering industry in Florida and those individuals licensed under

453Chapter 550, Florida Statutes.

4572. During the period of July 1 through September 10, 1997,

468Respondent held unrestricted "U1" Professional Pari-Mutuel

474Wagering Occupational License number 1538139-1081.

4793. During the period of July 27, 1997, through September 3,

4901997, Respondent was the trainer for Lobo Sable, a greyhound

500which Respondent entered in races at the Jefferson County Kennel

510Club in Jefferson County, Florida. Pari-mutuel wagering was

518conducted on those races.

5224. Respondent had leased Lobo Sable from Bill Elliott, the

532owner of the dog.

5365. On or about August 26, 1997, Respondent turned over

546approximately seven dogs to the Humane Society shelter in

555Tallahassee, Florida. On or about September 2, 1997, Respondent

564turned over approximately 17 more dogs to the Humane Society in

575Thomasville, Georgia. Respondent then returned to Iowa.

5826. Lobo Sable was one of the dogs turned over by Respondent

594to the Humane Society shelter in Thomasville, Georgia.

6027. On or about September 9, 1997, Lobo Sable was brought to

614Dr. Lillian Plank, D.V.M. at the Tallahassee Humane Society,

623a/k/a the Animal Aide Society, by Ms. Linthacum. Where and when

634Lobo Sable came into Ms. Linthacum's care, custody, and control,

644was never fully explained on the record, but it is inferred that

656she was somehow connected with the Thomasville, Georgia Humane

665Society.

6668. On September 9, 1997, another veterinarian, and Lillian

675Plank examined Lobo Sable. This examination showed deep ulcerous

684sores on each front leg, exposing the bone of each leg. Each

696ulcer was approximately 1-½ centimeters by 2 centimeters, to 2

706centimeters by 2-½ centimeters in diameter. Lobo Sable also had

716additional skin ulcers and lesions similar to bedsores,

724consistent with pressure/trauma due to prolonged confinement in

732an area with hard surfaces and no bedding.

7409. As testified by Dr. Plank, the ulcerous sores observed

750on Lobo Sable were a form of decubitus ulcer. Decubitus ulcers

761develop through stages, beginning with a reddening of the

770affected skin area, progressing through thickening of the skin

779and a reduction in blood circulation to the affected area, and

790finally result in an open ulcer. Racing greyhounds are

799vulnerable to decubitus ulcers because of their low body fat and

810lack of natural cushioning. On September 9, 1997, Lobo Sable's

820decubitus ulcers with exposed bones were more severe than any

830that Dr. Plank had seen during her 12 years of practice.

84110. During her September 9, 1997, examination of Lobo

850Sable, Dr. Plank also observed the animal to be flea-invested.

86011. Dr. Plank estimated that the conditions of confinement

869for Lobo Sable would have existed from seven to fourteen days in

881order to produce the types of decubitus which she saw on

892September 9, 1997.

89512. On direct examination, Dr. Plank conceded that the

904decubitus ulcers could have developed in as little as seven to

915ten days, and she would not clearly state that the sores she

927examined would have to have predated September 2, 1997.

93613. On cross-examination, Dr. Plank also conceded the

944scientific possibility that Lobo Sable's condition could have

952arisen in seven days.

95614. Dr. Plank opined that Lobo Sable was probably naturally

966thinner than the average greyhound. Lobo Sable weighed in at

97664 pounds at Dr. Plank's office on September 9, 1997.

98615. In order to appropriately treat the existing decubitii

995and prevent further decubitii, Dr. Plank felt that it was

1005necessary to have a nutritional focus (high protein diet),

1014utilize all antibiotics, and provide daily cleansing of the

1023wounds with topical treatment thereafter. She opined that the

1032dog minimally should have received this type of treatment when

1042the first signs of decubitus appeared and ideally should have

1052been placed on a cushioned bed. She did not believe the dog had

1065received any type of treatment at all.

107216. Respondent testified that when he delivered Lobo Sable

1081to the Humane Society in Thomasville, Georgia, on September 2,

10911997, the dog was immediately washed and dipped for fleas. This

1102testimony was not refuted, and according to Dr. Plank, the flea

1113dip solution by itself would not have enlarged existing decubitus

1123ulcers.

112417. No evidence one way or the other was introduced either

1135orally or by documentation to explain why Lobo Sable should have

1146been flea infested on September 9, 1997, if he had been flea

1158dipped on September 2, 1997.

116318. There is no evidence to show what care or lack of care

1176Lobo Sable received between September 2, 1997 and September 9,

11861997.

118719. Respondent testified that Lobo Sable had raced on

1196August 30, 1997, weighing 69 pounds. This testimony is supported

1206by Exhibit 4. The same exhibit indicates that Lobo Sable

1216officially weighed-in for races over the five to six week period

1227prior to August 30, 1997, at between 69 and 69 ½ pounds.

123920. Respondent testified without refutation that Lobo Sable

1247was examined by the track veterinarian immediately prior to his

1257race on August 30, 1997. No evidence of that veterinarian's

1267findings was admitted in evidence.

1272CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

127521. The Division of Administrative Hearings has

1282jurisdiction over the parties and subject matter of this cause,

1292pursuant to Section 120.57(1), Florida Statutes.

129822. Section 550.2415(6)(a), Florida Statutes, provides as

1305follows:

1306It is the intent of the Legislature that animals that

1316participate in races in this state on which pari mutuel

1326wagering is conducted and animals that are bred and

1335trained in this state for racing be treated humanely,

1344both on and off race tracks, throughout the lives of

1354the animals.

135623. Rule 61D-6.002(1), Florida Administrative Code,

1362provides as follows:

1365(1) The trainer of record shall be responsible for and

1375be the absolute insurer of the condition of the horses

1385or racing greyhounds he/she enters to raceainers,

1392kennel owners and operators are presumed to know the

1401rules of the division.

140524. The foregoing statute and rule are the only authority

1415cited by the Petitioner Agency in its administrative complaint or

1425in support of the requested penalty of a $250 administrative fine

1436and revocation of Respondent's pari-mutuel occupational license.

144325. Even read together, the statute and rule do not state

1454either a violation to be disciplined or a penalty to be imposed.

1466A duty of cradle-to-grave care of greyhounds can only be

1476inferred, but that is not sufficient to create notice of what

1487constitutes a violation of the aspirational statute and/or rule,

1496nor is it sufficient to impose a licensure penalty. "A court may

1508look to the title of an Act to aid in interpretation of the Act,

1522but the meaning may not be enlarged by the title." Cook v.

1534Blazer Financial Services, Inc. , 332 So. 2d 677 (Fla. 1st DCA

15451976). Furthermore, as the Court in Capital National Finance

1554Corporation v. Department of Insurance and Treasurer , 690 So. 2d

15641335 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997), stated,

"1570. . . binding on this Court is the rule that 'highly

1582regulatory and penal laws ought not to be extended by

1592construction.' Florida Industrial Commission v.

1597Manpower, Inc., of Miami , 91 So. 2d 197, 199 (Fla.

16071956)."

160826. Assuming arguendo, but not ruling, that Section

1616550.2415(3)(a), Florida Statutes, setting forth violation and

1623penalty guidelines and prosecutorial processes for impermissible

1630substances in race animals, could be applied to all aspects of

1641Section 550.2415, the Petitioner Agency still has failed to meet

1651the standard of proof for this type of case. The burden of proof

1664and duty to go forward in license revocation cases is upon the

1676prosecuting agency. The standard of proof is that of "clear and

1687convincing" evidence. Ferris v. Turlington , 510 So. 2d 292 (Fla.

16971997).

169827. "Clear and convincing evidence," requires that the

1706evidence presented must be found to be credible; the facts to

1717which the witnesses testify must be precise and explicit and the

1728witnesses must be lacking in confusion as to the facts in issue.

1740The evidence must be of such weight that it produces in the mind

1753of the trier of fact a firm belief or conviction without

1764hesitancy, as to the truth of the allegations sought to be

1775established. See Smith v. Department of Health and

1783Rehabilitative Services , 552 So. 2d 956 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988);

1793Slomovitz v. Walker , 429 So. 2d 797 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983).

180428. The evidence of damage by flea infestation and severe

1814ulcerous sores to Lobo Sable is overwhelming. The Petitioner

1823desires that an inference be drawn from the evidence of damage to

1835the dog to establish that Respondent neglected to provide humane

1845treatment. Respondent surmises that Lobo Sable's condition was

1853not identifiable during the period of time that Respondent had

1863care, custody and control of him, and that the dog's condition

1874had deteriorated between September 2, 1997, when Respondent

1882relied on the Thomasville Humane Society to assume the dog's

1892care, until September 9, 1997, when the dog was presented to Dr.

1904Plank.

190529. The evidence and facts as found clearly show that Lobo

1916Sable raced at its usual weight on August 30, 1997. By law, in

1929order to race, the dog had to be inspected by a veterinarian

1941shortly prior to the time it raced. It is unlikely that the

1953track veterinarian would have approved Lobo Sable for racing if a

1964deteriorated skin condition had been noticeable on August 30,

19731997. Moreover, Lobo Sable was out of Respondent's care, custody

1983and control no later than September 3, 1997. That indicates that

1994the dog was only in Respondent's care, custody and control for

2005approximately two days before being turned over to the Georgia

2015Humane Society. Dr. Plank conceded the scientific possibility

2023that Lobo Sable's decubitii could have arisen and worsened

2032significantly in seven days, and that this thin greyhound,

2041weighing 64 pounds, could have had its condition accelerated over

2051a seven to ten day period. This state of affairs does not

2063constitute "clear and convincing" evidence of inhumane treatment

2071or neglect by Respondent. Neglect or abuse of Lobo Sable cannot

2082be clearly attributed to Respondent, and abuse or neglect of the

2093dog between September 2 and September 9 by another has not

2104convincingly been ruled out.

2108RECOMMENDATION

2109Upon the foregoing findings of fact and conclusions of law,

2119it is

2121RECOMMENDED that the Department of Business Professional

2128Regulation, Division of Pari-Mutuel Wagering enter a Final Order

2137dismissing the administrative complaint against Respondent.

2143DONE AND ENTERED this 16th day of November, 1998, in

2153Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida.

2157_____________________________ ______

2159ELLA JANE P. DAVIS

2163Administrative Law Judge

2166Division of Administrative Hearings

2170The DeSoto Building

21731230 Apalachee Parkway

2176Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3060

2179(850) 488-9675 SUNCOM 278-9675

2183Fax Filing (850) 921-6847

2187Filed with the Clerk of the

2193Division of Administrative Hearings

2197this 16th day of November, 1998.

2203COPIES FURNISHED:

2205Eric Miller, Esquire

2208Department of Business and

2212Professional Regulation

2214Division of Pari-Mutuel Wagering

22181940 North Monroe Street

2222Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1007

2225Salvatore Lembo

2227c/o Flying Lightning Kennel

2231Apartment 5

22331900 Washington Street

2236Dubuque, Iowa 52001

2239Deborah R. Miller, Director

2243Pari-Mutuel Wagering

2245Department of Business and

2249Professional Regulation

22511940 North Monroe Street

2255Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0792

2258Lynda L. Goodgame, General Counsel

2263Department of Business and

2267Professional Regulation

22691940 North Monroe Street

2273Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0792

2276NOTICE OF RIGHT TO SUBMIT EXCEPTIONS

2282All parties have the right to submit written exceptions within 15

2293days from the date of this Recommended Order. Any exceptions to

2304this Recommended Order should be filed with the agency that will

2315issue the final order in this case.

Select the PDF icon to view the document.
PDF
Date
Proceedings
PDF:
Date: 07/15/2004
Proceedings: Final Order filed.
PDF:
Date: 01/29/1999
Proceedings: Agency Final Order
PDF:
Date: 11/16/1998
Proceedings: Recommended Order
PDF:
Date: 11/16/1998
Proceedings: Recommended Order sent out. CASE CLOSED. Hearing held 10/19/98.
Date: 10/30/1998
Proceedings: (Respondent) Proposed Recommended Order (filed via facsimile).
Date: 10/28/1998
Proceedings: Corrected Page 1 of Petitioner`s Recommended Order (filed via facsimile).
Date: 10/28/1998
Proceedings: Petitioner`s Proposed Recommended Order filed.
Date: 10/19/1998
Proceedings: Telephonic Hearing Held; see case file for applicable time frames.
Date: 07/22/1998
Proceedings: Notice of Telephonic Hearing and Order of Instructions sent out. (Telephonic hearing set for 10/19/98; 12:00pm)
Date: 07/17/1998
Proceedings: (Petitioner) Response to Initial Order filed.
Date: 07/14/1998
Proceedings: Initial Order issued.
Date: 07/08/1998
Proceedings: Agency Referral letter; Administrative Complaint; Election of Rights filed.

Case Information

Judge:
ELLA JANE P. DAVIS
Date Filed:
07/08/1998
Date Assignment:
07/14/1998
Last Docket Entry:
07/15/2004
Location:
Monticello, Florida
District:
Northern
Agency:
ADOPTED IN TOTO
 

Related DOAH Cases(s) (1):

Related Florida Statute(s) (2):

Related Florida Rule(s) (1):