98-002973
Division Of Pari-Mutuel Wagering vs.
Salvatore F. Lembo
Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Monday, November 16, 1998.
Recommended Order on Monday, November 16, 1998.
1STATE OF FLORIDA
4DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
8DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND )
13PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, )
16DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING, )
21)
22Petitioner, )
24)
25vs. ) Case No. 98-2973
30)
31SALVATORE F. LEMBO, )
35)
36Respondent. )
38)
39RECOMMENDED ORDER
41Upon due notice, this cause came on for formal hearing by
52telephonic conference call on October 19, 1998, before Ella Jane
62P. Davis, a duly assigned Administrative Law Judge of the
72Division of Administrative Hearings. Petitioner's counsel and
79witness were present in Tallahassee, Florida, at a different
88location than that of the Administrative Law Judge. Respondent,
97who testified on his own behalf, was present in Debuque, Iowa.
108APPEARANCES
109For Petitioner: Eric H. Miller
114Chief Assistan t General Counsel
119Department of Business and
123Professional Regulation
1251940 North Monroe Street
129Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1007
132For Respondent: Salvatore F. Lembro, pro se
1391900 Washington Street, Number 5
144Dubuque, Iowa 52001
147STATEMENT OF THE ISSUE
151Whether Respondent violated Section 550.2415(6)(a), Florida
157Statutes, and Rule 61D-6.002(1), Florida Administrative Code.
164PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
166This action was initiated by an administrative complaint
174filed by the Division of Pari-Mutuel Wagering on or about June 5,
1861998.
187Both counts of the administrative complaint contain a single
196allegation that Respondent neglected to provide humane treatment
204to a racing greyhound known as "Lobo Sable," resulting in severe
215ulcerous sores of the dog's skin. The only difference in the
226administrative complaint's two counts is that one count addresses
235Section 550.2415(6)(a), Florida Statutes, and the other count
243addresses the Rule 61D-6.002(1), Florida Administrative Code.
250Respondent timely requested formal hearing, and the cause
258was referred to the Division of Administrative Hearings on or
268about July 14, 1998. Pursuant to stipulation, formal hearing was
278conducted by a three-way telephonic conference call on
286October 19, 1998.
289Petitioner complied with the prehearing order by filing a
298prehearing statement and pre-filing exhibits. At formal hearing,
306Respondent stipulated that the facts as stated under Section C,
316paragraphs 1-8 of Petitioner's prehearing statement were
323admitted. These stipulated facts have been utilized as
331appropriate wi thin this Recommended Order.
337The parties agreed that the undersigned take official
345recognition of Petitioner's pre-numbered Exhibits 1 and 2.
353Petitioner's Exhibits 3 and 4 were ultimately admitted as joint
363exhibits of the parties. Petitioner's Exhibit 5 also was
372admitted in evidence. Petitioner presented the oral testimony of
381Dr. Lillian Plank, D.V.M. Respondent testified on his own
390behalf.
391No transcript was filed. All timely filed proposed findings
400of fact and conclusions of law have been considered in the
411preparation of this recommended order.
416FINDINGS OF FACT
4191. Petitioner is the State of Florida, Department of
428Business and Professional Regulation, Division of Pari-Mutuel
435Wagering. That Agency is charged with regulating the pari-mutuel
444wagering industry in Florida and those individuals licensed under
453Chapter 550, Florida Statutes.
4572. During the period of July 1 through September 10, 1997,
468Respondent held unrestricted "U1" Professional Pari-Mutuel
474Wagering Occupational License number 1538139-1081.
4793. During the period of July 27, 1997, through September 3,
4901997, Respondent was the trainer for Lobo Sable, a greyhound
500which Respondent entered in races at the Jefferson County Kennel
510Club in Jefferson County, Florida. Pari-mutuel wagering was
518conducted on those races.
5224. Respondent had leased Lobo Sable from Bill Elliott, the
532owner of the dog.
5365. On or about August 26, 1997, Respondent turned over
546approximately seven dogs to the Humane Society shelter in
555Tallahassee, Florida. On or about September 2, 1997, Respondent
564turned over approximately 17 more dogs to the Humane Society in
575Thomasville, Georgia. Respondent then returned to Iowa.
5826. Lobo Sable was one of the dogs turned over by Respondent
594to the Humane Society shelter in Thomasville, Georgia.
6027. On or about September 9, 1997, Lobo Sable was brought to
614Dr. Lillian Plank, D.V.M. at the Tallahassee Humane Society,
623a/k/a the Animal Aide Society, by Ms. Linthacum. Where and when
634Lobo Sable came into Ms. Linthacum's care, custody, and control,
644was never fully explained on the record, but it is inferred that
656she was somehow connected with the Thomasville, Georgia Humane
665Society.
6668. On September 9, 1997, another veterinarian, and Lillian
675Plank examined Lobo Sable. This examination showed deep ulcerous
684sores on each front leg, exposing the bone of each leg. Each
696ulcer was approximately 1-½ centimeters by 2 centimeters, to 2
706centimeters by 2-½ centimeters in diameter. Lobo Sable also had
716additional skin ulcers and lesions similar to bedsores,
724consistent with pressure/trauma due to prolonged confinement in
732an area with hard surfaces and no bedding.
7409. As testified by Dr. Plank, the ulcerous sores observed
750on Lobo Sable were a form of decubitus ulcer. Decubitus ulcers
761develop through stages, beginning with a reddening of the
770affected skin area, progressing through thickening of the skin
779and a reduction in blood circulation to the affected area, and
790finally result in an open ulcer. Racing greyhounds are
799vulnerable to decubitus ulcers because of their low body fat and
810lack of natural cushioning. On September 9, 1997, Lobo Sable's
820decubitus ulcers with exposed bones were more severe than any
830that Dr. Plank had seen during her 12 years of practice.
84110. During her September 9, 1997, examination of Lobo
850Sable, Dr. Plank also observed the animal to be flea-invested.
86011. Dr. Plank estimated that the conditions of confinement
869for Lobo Sable would have existed from seven to fourteen days in
881order to produce the types of decubitus which she saw on
892September 9, 1997.
89512. On direct examination, Dr. Plank conceded that the
904decubitus ulcers could have developed in as little as seven to
915ten days, and she would not clearly state that the sores she
927examined would have to have predated September 2, 1997.
93613. On cross-examination, Dr. Plank also conceded the
944scientific possibility that Lobo Sable's condition could have
952arisen in seven days.
95614. Dr. Plank opined that Lobo Sable was probably naturally
966thinner than the average greyhound. Lobo Sable weighed in at
97664 pounds at Dr. Plank's office on September 9, 1997.
98615. In order to appropriately treat the existing decubitii
995and prevent further decubitii, Dr. Plank felt that it was
1005necessary to have a nutritional focus (high protein diet),
1014utilize all antibiotics, and provide daily cleansing of the
1023wounds with topical treatment thereafter. She opined that the
1032dog minimally should have received this type of treatment when
1042the first signs of decubitus appeared and ideally should have
1052been placed on a cushioned bed. She did not believe the dog had
1065received any type of treatment at all.
107216. Respondent testified that when he delivered Lobo Sable
1081to the Humane Society in Thomasville, Georgia, on September 2,
10911997, the dog was immediately washed and dipped for fleas. This
1102testimony was not refuted, and according to Dr. Plank, the flea
1113dip solution by itself would not have enlarged existing decubitus
1123ulcers.
112417. No evidence one way or the other was introduced either
1135orally or by documentation to explain why Lobo Sable should have
1146been flea infested on September 9, 1997, if he had been flea
1158dipped on September 2, 1997.
116318. There is no evidence to show what care or lack of care
1176Lobo Sable received between September 2, 1997 and September 9,
11861997.
118719. Respondent testified that Lobo Sable had raced on
1196August 30, 1997, weighing 69 pounds. This testimony is supported
1206by Exhibit 4. The same exhibit indicates that Lobo Sable
1216officially weighed-in for races over the five to six week period
1227prior to August 30, 1997, at between 69 and 69 ½ pounds.
123920. Respondent testified without refutation that Lobo Sable
1247was examined by the track veterinarian immediately prior to his
1257race on August 30, 1997. No evidence of that veterinarian's
1267findings was admitted in evidence.
1272CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
127521. The Division of Administrative Hearings has
1282jurisdiction over the parties and subject matter of this cause,
1292pursuant to Section 120.57(1), Florida Statutes.
129822. Section 550.2415(6)(a), Florida Statutes, provides as
1305follows:
1306It is the intent of the Legislature that animals that
1316participate in races in this state on which pari mutuel
1326wagering is conducted and animals that are bred and
1335trained in this state for racing be treated humanely,
1344both on and off race tracks, throughout the lives of
1354the animals.
135623. Rule 61D-6.002(1), Florida Administrative Code,
1362provides as follows:
1365(1) The trainer of record shall be responsible for and
1375be the absolute insurer of the condition of the horses
1385or racing greyhounds he/she enters to raceainers,
1392kennel owners and operators are presumed to know the
1401rules of the division.
140524. The foregoing statute and rule are the only authority
1415cited by the Petitioner Agency in its administrative complaint or
1425in support of the requested penalty of a $250 administrative fine
1436and revocation of Respondent's pari-mutuel occupational license.
144325. Even read together, the statute and rule do not state
1454either a violation to be disciplined or a penalty to be imposed.
1466A duty of cradle-to-grave care of greyhounds can only be
1476inferred, but that is not sufficient to create notice of what
1487constitutes a violation of the aspirational statute and/or rule,
1496nor is it sufficient to impose a licensure penalty. "A court may
1508look to the title of an Act to aid in interpretation of the Act,
1522but the meaning may not be enlarged by the title." Cook v.
1534Blazer Financial Services, Inc. , 332 So. 2d 677 (Fla. 1st DCA
15451976). Furthermore, as the Court in Capital National Finance
1554Corporation v. Department of Insurance and Treasurer , 690 So. 2d
15641335 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997), stated,
"1570. . . binding on this Court is the rule that 'highly
1582regulatory and penal laws ought not to be extended by
1592construction.' Florida Industrial Commission v.
1597Manpower, Inc., of Miami , 91 So. 2d 197, 199 (Fla.
16071956)."
160826. Assuming arguendo, but not ruling, that Section
1616550.2415(3)(a), Florida Statutes, setting forth violation and
1623penalty guidelines and prosecutorial processes for impermissible
1630substances in race animals, could be applied to all aspects of
1641Section 550.2415, the Petitioner Agency still has failed to meet
1651the standard of proof for this type of case. The burden of proof
1664and duty to go forward in license revocation cases is upon the
1676prosecuting agency. The standard of proof is that of "clear and
1687convincing" evidence. Ferris v. Turlington , 510 So. 2d 292 (Fla.
16971997).
169827. "Clear and convincing evidence," requires that the
1706evidence presented must be found to be credible; the facts to
1717which the witnesses testify must be precise and explicit and the
1728witnesses must be lacking in confusion as to the facts in issue.
1740The evidence must be of such weight that it produces in the mind
1753of the trier of fact a firm belief or conviction without
1764hesitancy, as to the truth of the allegations sought to be
1775established. See Smith v. Department of Health and
1783Rehabilitative Services , 552 So. 2d 956 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988);
1793Slomovitz v. Walker , 429 So. 2d 797 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983).
180428. The evidence of damage by flea infestation and severe
1814ulcerous sores to Lobo Sable is overwhelming. The Petitioner
1823desires that an inference be drawn from the evidence of damage to
1835the dog to establish that Respondent neglected to provide humane
1845treatment. Respondent surmises that Lobo Sable's condition was
1853not identifiable during the period of time that Respondent had
1863care, custody and control of him, and that the dog's condition
1874had deteriorated between September 2, 1997, when Respondent
1882relied on the Thomasville Humane Society to assume the dog's
1892care, until September 9, 1997, when the dog was presented to Dr.
1904Plank.
190529. The evidence and facts as found clearly show that Lobo
1916Sable raced at its usual weight on August 30, 1997. By law, in
1929order to race, the dog had to be inspected by a veterinarian
1941shortly prior to the time it raced. It is unlikely that the
1953track veterinarian would have approved Lobo Sable for racing if a
1964deteriorated skin condition had been noticeable on August 30,
19731997. Moreover, Lobo Sable was out of Respondent's care, custody
1983and control no later than September 3, 1997. That indicates that
1994the dog was only in Respondent's care, custody and control for
2005approximately two days before being turned over to the Georgia
2015Humane Society. Dr. Plank conceded the scientific possibility
2023that Lobo Sable's decubitii could have arisen and worsened
2032significantly in seven days, and that this thin greyhound,
2041weighing 64 pounds, could have had its condition accelerated over
2051a seven to ten day period. This state of affairs does not
2063constitute "clear and convincing" evidence of inhumane treatment
2071or neglect by Respondent. Neglect or abuse of Lobo Sable cannot
2082be clearly attributed to Respondent, and abuse or neglect of the
2093dog between September 2 and September 9 by another has not
2104convincingly been ruled out.
2108RECOMMENDATION
2109Upon the foregoing findings of fact and conclusions of law,
2119it is
2121RECOMMENDED that the Department of Business Professional
2128Regulation, Division of Pari-Mutuel Wagering enter a Final Order
2137dismissing the administrative complaint against Respondent.
2143DONE AND ENTERED this 16th day of November, 1998, in
2153Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida.
2157_____________________________ ______
2159ELLA JANE P. DAVIS
2163Administrative Law Judge
2166Division of Administrative Hearings
2170The DeSoto Building
21731230 Apalachee Parkway
2176Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3060
2179(850) 488-9675 SUNCOM 278-9675
2183Fax Filing (850) 921-6847
2187Filed with the Clerk of the
2193Division of Administrative Hearings
2197this 16th day of November, 1998.
2203COPIES FURNISHED:
2205Eric Miller, Esquire
2208Department of Business and
2212Professional Regulation
2214Division of Pari-Mutuel Wagering
22181940 North Monroe Street
2222Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1007
2225Salvatore Lembo
2227c/o Flying Lightning Kennel
2231Apartment 5
22331900 Washington Street
2236Dubuque, Iowa 52001
2239Deborah R. Miller, Director
2243Pari-Mutuel Wagering
2245Department of Business and
2249Professional Regulation
22511940 North Monroe Street
2255Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0792
2258Lynda L. Goodgame, General Counsel
2263Department of Business and
2267Professional Regulation
22691940 North Monroe Street
2273Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0792
2276NOTICE OF RIGHT TO SUBMIT EXCEPTIONS
2282All parties have the right to submit written exceptions within 15
2293days from the date of this Recommended Order. Any exceptions to
2304this Recommended Order should be filed with the agency that will
2315issue the final order in this case.
- Date
- Proceedings
- Date: 10/30/1998
- Proceedings: (Respondent) Proposed Recommended Order (filed via facsimile).
- Date: 10/28/1998
- Proceedings: Corrected Page 1 of Petitioner`s Recommended Order (filed via facsimile).
- Date: 10/28/1998
- Proceedings: Petitioner`s Proposed Recommended Order filed.
- Date: 10/19/1998
- Proceedings: Telephonic Hearing Held; see case file for applicable time frames.
- Date: 07/22/1998
- Proceedings: Notice of Telephonic Hearing and Order of Instructions sent out. (Telephonic hearing set for 10/19/98; 12:00pm)
- Date: 07/17/1998
- Proceedings: (Petitioner) Response to Initial Order filed.
- Date: 07/14/1998
- Proceedings: Initial Order issued.
- Date: 07/08/1998
- Proceedings: Agency Referral letter; Administrative Complaint; Election of Rights filed.
Case Information
- Judge:
- ELLA JANE P. DAVIS
- Date Filed:
- 07/08/1998
- Date Assignment:
- 07/14/1998
- Last Docket Entry:
- 07/15/2004
- Location:
- Monticello, Florida
- District:
- Northern
- Agency:
- ADOPTED IN TOTO