01-000262PL
Department Of Business And Professional Regulation, Division Of Pari-Mutuel Wagering vs.
Douglas J. Levkoff
Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Tuesday, June 12, 2001.
Recommended Order on Tuesday, June 12, 2001.
1STATE OF FLORIDA
4DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
8DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND )
13PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION )
17OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING , )
21)
22Petitioner , )
24)
25vs. ) Case No. 01-0262PL
30)
31DOUGLAS J. LEVKOFF , )
35)
36Respondent. )
38__________________________________)
39RECOMMENDED ORDER
41Pursuant to notice, a final hearing was held in this case on
53March 29, 2001, in Miami, Florida, before Administrative Law
62Judge Michael M. Parrish of the Division of Administrative
71Hearings.
72APPEARANCES
73For Petitioner : Joseph M. Helton, Jr., Esquire
81Department of Business and
85Professional Regulation
87Division of Pari-Mutuel Wagering
91Northwood Centre
931940 North Monroe Street, Suite 60
99Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2202
102For Respondent : Douglas J. Levkoff
1087218 West 4th Avenue
112Hialeah, Florida 33014
115STATEMENT OF THE ISSUE
119This is a license discipline case in which the Petitioner
129seeks to take disciplinary action against a licensee on the basis
140of allegations in an Administrative Complaint in which the
149Respondent is charged with two violations of Section
157550.2415(1)(a), Florida Statutes.
160PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
162Following the issuance and service of the Administrative
170Complaint, the Respondent made a timely request for an
179evidentiary hearing. The case was then transferred to the
188Division of Administrative Hearings, where it was scheduled for
197hearing. On March 9, 2001, the parties filed a written
207stipulation, by means of which they stipulated to some of the
218facts in this case.
222At the final hearing on March 29, 2001, the Petitioner
232presented the testimony of three witnesses and offered nine
241exhibits, all of which were received in evidence. The Respondent
251testified on his own behalf, but did not call any additional
262witnesses. The Respondent did not offer any exhibits.
270At the conclusion of the hearing, the deadline for filing
280proposed recommended orders was established as ten days following
289the filing of the transcript. The transcript was filed on
299April 26, 2001. Because the Respondent did not receive timely
309notice of the filing of the transcript, the deadline for filing
320proposed recommended orders was extended for all parties until
329May 29, 2001. The Petitioner filed a timely Proposed Recommended
339Order. As of the date of this Recommended Order, the Respondent
350has not filed any post-hearing documents.
356FINDINGS OF FACT
3591. The Petitioner is the State of Florida, Department of
369Business of Professional Regulation, Division of Pari-Mutuel
376Wagering (Division) which is created by Section 20.165(2)(f),
384Florida Statutes.
3862. The Respondent, Douglas J. Levkoff, is the holder of an
397unrestricted U-1 Professional Pari-Mutuel License, License Number
40410311836-1081, issued by the Division on or about July 1, 2000.
4153. West Flagler is a permitholder authorized to conduct
424greyhound racing and pari-mutuel wagering in the State of
433Florida.
4344. On September 9, 2000, the Respondent was the trainer for
445a racing greyhound named "Dodge A Ram."
4525. The racing greyhound "Dodge A Ram" finished third in the
463ninth race of the evening performance of West Flagler on
473September 9, 2000.
4766. Immediately after the race a urine sample was collected
486from "Dodge A Ram." The urine sample was assigned sample number
497651573.
4987. The University of Florida Racing Laboratory tested urine
507sample number 651573, and found it to contain Benzoylecgonine. 1
5178. On September 23, 2000, the Respondent was the trainer
527for a racing greyhound named "Izz Our Patsy."
5359. The racing greyhound "Izz Our Patsy" finished first in
545the sixth race of the matinee performance of West Flagler on
556September 23, 2000.
55910. Immediately after the race a urine sample was collected
569from "Izz Our Patsy." The urine sample was assigned sample
579number 652144.
58111. The University of Florida Racing Laboratory tested
589urine sample number 652144, and found it to contain
598Benzoylecgonine. 2
60012. Benzoylecgonine is a metabolite of Cocaine. It is the
610primary marker of Cocaine in forensic technology. The metabolite
619Benzoylecgonine is not produced by any drug other than Cocaine.
629Cocaine is a Class 1 drug according to the Association of Racing
641Commissioners International classification system.
64513. The Respondent is the trainer of record for Sun Coast
656Kennels, which provides greyhounds for racing to West Flagler
665Greyhound Track. He is listed as the trainer for Sun Coast
676Kennels on the kennel personnel roster filed with the Racing
686Secretary at West Flagler.
69014. Sun Coast Kennels is assigned kennel number 17 by West
701Flagler for identification purposes. Specifically, the
707Respondent provided the names of "Dodge A Ram" and "Izz Our
718Patsy" to West Flagler through a listing of available greyhounds
728and an official schooling, respectively.
733CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
73615. The Division of Administrative Hearings has
743jurisdiction over the parties to and the subject matter of this
754proceeding pursuant to Section 120.57(1), Florida Statutes.
76116. The Division is the agency of the State of Florida that
773is charged with the regulation of the pari-mutuel wagering
782industry pursuant to Section 550.0251, Florida Statutes. The
790Division has the burden of proving by clear and convincing
800evidence that disciplinary action should be taken against
808Respondent's occupational license. Ferris v. Turlington , 510 So.
8162d 292 (Fla. 1987).
82017. Section 550.2415(1)(a), Florida Statutes, reads as
827follows:
828(1)(a ) The racing of an animal with any
837drug, medication, stimulant, depressant,
841hypnotic, narcotic, local anesthetic, or
846drug-masking agent is prohibited. It is a
853violation of this section for a person to
861administer or cause to be administered any
868drug, medication, stimulant, depressant,
872hypnotic, narcotic, local anesthetic, or
877drug-masking agent to an animal which will
884result in a positive test for such substance
892based on samples taken from the animal
899immediately prior to or immediately after the
906racing of that animal. Test results and the
914identities of the animals being tested and of
922their trainers and owners of record are
929confidential and exempt from s. 119.07(1) and
936from s. 24(a), Art. I of the State
944Constitution for 10 days after testing of all
952samples collected on a particular day has
959been completed and any positive test results
966derived from such samples have been reported
973to the director of the division or
980administrative action has been commenced.
98518. Rule 61D-6.002(1), Florida Administrative Code, reads
992as follows:
994The trainer of record shall be responsible
1001for and the absolute insurer of the condition
1009of the horses or greyhounds he/she enters to
1017raceainers, kennel owners and operators
1022are presumed to know the rules of the
1030division.
103119. Rule 61D-6.002(1), Florida Administrative Code, also
1038known as the Absolute Insurer Rule, is based on a theory of
1050strict liability as a condition of licensure, which is necessary
1060to protect the industry's integrity. In its decision upholding
1069the validity of the Absolute Insurer Rule, the Supreme Court of
1080Florida in Division of Pari-Mutuel Wagering, Department of
1088Business Regulation v. Caple , 362 So. 2d 1350 (Fla. 1978), held
1099as follows:
1101On review of these more recent authorities,
1108we are now persuaded that Florida should
1115align itself with the well reasoned majority
1122view. To protect the integrity of this
1129unique industry, it is really immaterial
1135whether "guilt" should be ascribed either
1141directly or indirectly to the trainer. The
1148rules were designed, and reasonably so, to
1155condition the grant of a trainer's license on
1163the trainer's acceptance of an absolute duty
1170to ensure compliance with reasonable
1175regulation governing the areas over which the
1182trainer has responsibility. Whether a
1187violation occurs as a result of the personal
1195acts of the trainer, of persons under his
1203supervision, or even of unknown third
1209parties, the condition of licensure has been
1216violated by the failure to provide adequate
1223control, and the consequence of the default
1230is possible suspension of the trainer's
1236license or a fine. We have no doubt that a
1246rule which both conditions a license and
1253establishes with specificity reasonable
1257precautionary duties within the competence of
1263the licensee to perform is both reasonable
1270and constitutional.
1272Caple , 362 So. 2d 1350, 1354-1355.
127820. The evidence is clear and convincing that the
1287Respondent is the trainer of record for the greyhounds "Dodge A
1298Ram" and "Izz Our Patsy." By listing "Dodge A Ram" on the list
1311of available greyhounds and "Izz Our Patsy" on an official
1321schooling, the Respondent was the trainer who entered those dogs
1331to race. Therefore, under the established case law of Florida,
1341he is strictly responsible for their condition if they are found
1352to have tested positive for prohibited drugs.
135921. Section 550.2415(1)(c), Florida Statutes, reads as
1366follows:
1367(c ) The finding of a prohibited substance in
1376a race-day specimen constitutes prima facie
1382evidence that the substance was administered
1388and was carried in the body of the animal
1397while participating in the race.
140222. The effect of Section 550.2415(1)(c), Florida Statutes,
1410is to create a rebuttable presumption that an impermissible drug
1420was administered and that the drug was carried in the body of the
1433animal during the race on the day the specimen was collected. It
1445has been clearly and convincingly established that the greyhounds
1454trained by the Respondent produced race day specimens that
1463contained B enzoylecgonine, a metabolite of Cocaine, which is a
1473prohibited substance. Therefore, the Division has established
1480its prima facie case.
148423. There has been no evidence proffered by the Respondent
1494that calls into question either the collection of the samples in
1505this case or the testing of the samples in this case. While the
1518Respondent alluded to one incident when a person was able to
1529enter the jenny pit area prior to a race, there is no evidence to
1543connect that incident to either of the races at issue in this
1555case. Therefore, the Respondent has failed to rebut the
1564Division's prima facie case that Cocaine was administered and was
1574carried in the bodies of the greyhounds "Dodge A Ram" and "Izz
1586Our Patsy" while participating in the races in question.
159524. The Respondent was the trainer of record for the
1605greyhounds "Dodge A Ram" and "Izz Our Patsy," which ran in the
1617ninth race of the evening performance of West Flagler on
1627September 9, 2000, and in the sixth race of the matinee
1638performance of West Flagler on September 23, 2000, respectively.
1647Therefore, the Respondent is responsible for the two violations
1656of Section 550.2415(1)(a), Florida Statutes, as alleged in the
1665Administrative Complaint.
166725. In a similar case recently decided by the Division of
1678Administrative Hearings, the Division of Pari-Mutuel Wagering has
1686entered a Final Order in Division of Pari-Mutuel Wagering vs.
1696Celestina M. Gangemi , DOAH Case No. 00-3816PL, DBPR Final Order
1706No. BPR-2001-01307. In that case, a thoroughbred horse trainer
1715was suspended for ten days and fined one hundred dollars ($100)
1726for a horse that tested positive for similar levels of
1736Benzoylecgonine as those found in the two greyhounds trained by
1746the Respondent. The Division of Pari-Mutuel Wagering also
1754adopted the recommendation that the purse at issue in that case
1765be returned as well. Therefore, it is appropriate to impose the
1776same penalty for each positive test in this case.
1785RECOMMENDATION
1786Based on the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of
1796Law, it is
1799RECOMMENDED that the Division of Pari-Mutuel Wagering enter
1807a final order in this case suspending the Respondent's license
1817for a period of twenty days, imposing an administrative fine in
1828the total amount of $200.00, and requiring the return of any
1839purse that was received by the Respondent as a result of the two
1852races at issue in this case.
1858DONE AND ENTERED this 12th day of June, 2001, in
1868Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida.
1872___________________________________
1873MICHAEL M. PARRISH
1876Administrative Law Judge
1879Division of Administrative Hearings
1883The DeSoto Building
18861230 Apalachee Parkway
1889Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3060
1892(850) 488- 9675 SUNCOM 278-9675
1897Fax Filing (850) 921-6847
1901www.doah.state.fl.us
1902Filed with the Clerk of the
1908Division of Administrative Hearings
1912this 12th day of June, 2001.
1918ENDNOTES
19191/ The amount of Benzoylecgonine detected in this sample was
1929minute. It was estimated to be less than 10 nanograms per
1940milliliter.
19412/ This sample also contained less than 10 nanograms per
1951milliliter of Benzoylecgonine.
1954COPIES FURNISHED:
1956Dr. Paul F. Kirsch, Director
1961Department of Business and
1965Professional Regulation
1967Division of Pari-Mutuel Wagering
1971Northwood Centre
19731940 North Monroe Street, Suite 60
1979Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2202
1982Hardy L. Roberts, III, General Counsel
1988Department of Business and
1992Professional Regulation
1994Division of Pari-Mutuel Wagering
1998Northwood Centre
20001940 North Monroe Street, Suite 60
2006Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2202
2009Joseph M. Helton, Jr., Esquire
2014Department of Business and
2018Professional Regulation
2020Division of Pari-Mutuel Wagering
2024Northwood Centre
20261940 North Monroe Street, Suite 60
2032Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2202
2035Douglas J. Levkoff
20387218 West 4th Avenue
2042Hialeah, Florida 33014
2045NOTICE OF RIGHT TO SUBMIT EXCEPTIONS
2051All parties have the right to submit written exceptions within 15
2062days from the date of this Recommended Order. Any exceptions to
2073this Recommended Order should be filed with the agency that will
2084issue the Final Order in this case.
- Date
- Proceedings
- PDF:
- Date: 06/12/2001
- Proceedings: Recommended Order issued (hearing held March 29, 2001) CASE CLOSED.
- PDF:
- Date: 06/12/2001
- Proceedings: Recommended Order cover letter identifying hearing record referred to the Agency sent out.
- Date: 04/26/2001
- Proceedings: Transcript filed.
- Date: 03/29/2001
- Proceedings: CASE STATUS: Hearing Held; see case file for applicable time frames.
- PDF:
- Date: 02/08/2001
- Proceedings: Notice of Filing Petitioner`s First Request for Admissions filed.
Case Information
- Judge:
- MICHAEL M. PARRISH
- Date Filed:
- 01/18/2001
- Date Assignment:
- 03/26/2001
- Last Docket Entry:
- 07/15/2004
- Location:
- Miami, Florida
- District:
- Southern
- Agency:
- ADOPTED IN TOTO
- Suffix:
- PL
Counsels
-
Joseph M. Helton, Jr., Esquire
Address of Record -
Douglas J Levkoff
Address of Record -
Joseph M Helton, Jr., Esquire
Address of Record