09-001918 Scooters Management, Llc And Gator Moto, Llc vs. Swamp Cycle, Llc
 Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Thursday, November 5, 2009.


View Dockets  
Summary: Petitioner failed to appear and therefore failed to demonstrate inadequate representation of ZHNG motorcycles.

1STATE OF FLORIDA

4DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS

8SCOOTERS MANAGEMENT, LLC and )

13GATOR MOTO, LLC, )

17)

18Petitioners, )

20)

21vs. ) Case No. 09-1918

26)

27SWAMP CYCLE, LLC, )

31)

32Respondent. )

34)

35RECOMMENDED ORDER

37This cause came on for final hearing before Harry L.

47Hooper, Administrative Law Judge with the Division of

55Administrative Hearings, on October 27, 2009, in Gainesville,

63Florida.

64APPEARANCES

65For Petitioner: No appearance

69For Respondent: Shawn Glasser

73Swamp Cycles, LLC

76633 Northwest 13th Street

80Gainesville, Florida 32601

83STATEMENT OF THE ISSUE

87The issue is whether Petitioner's location for the sale of

97ZHNG motorcycles is lawful pursuant to Section 320.642, Florida

106Statutes.

107PRELIMINARY STATEMENT

109Scooters Management, LLC, of Houston, Texas, announced

116through publication in the Florida Administrative Weekly, that

124it intended to allow the establishment of Gator Moto, LLC,

134(Gator) as a dealership for the sale of motorcycles manufactured

144by Taizhou Zhongneng Motorcycle Co. Ltd. (ZHNG), in Alachua

153County, Florida. Swamp Cycle, LLC (Swamp) an existing ZHNG

162motorcycle dealer in Alachua County, Florida, timely protested

170the establishment of another dealership in Alachua County in a

180filing with the Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor

190Vehicles (Department), on April 13, 2009.

196The matter was forwarded to the Division of Administrative

205Hearings by the Department and was filed April 15, 2009.

215Pursuant to Subsection 320.699(2), Florida Statutes, 180 days

223must elapse prior to the scheduling of a hearing on these types

235of cases. Accordingly, the case was set for hearing on

245October 27, 2009, more than 180 days from the time of the

257objection. The case was heard as scheduled.

264At the hearing, Swamp presented the testimony of its

273principal Shawn Glasser.

276References to statutes are to Florida Statutes (2008)

284unless otherwise noted.

287FINDINGS OF FACT

2901. Swamp is an established, licensed dealer in the sale of

301ZHNG motorcycles. Its place of business is located at 633

311Northwest 13th Street, Gainesville, Alachua County, Florida.

3182. Gator sought to establish a dealership, also for the

328sale of ZHNG motorcycles, at 7065 Northwest 22nd Street, Suite

338A, Gainesville, Alachua County, Florida.

3433. The distance between 633 Northwest 13th Street and 7065

353Northwest 22nd Street, Gainesville, Alachua County, Florida, is

361substantially less than 20 miles.

3664. Alachua County, Florida, has a population of less than

376300,000 people, according to the latest population estimates of

386the University of Florida, Bureau of Economic and Business

395Research.

396CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

3995. The Division of Administrative Hearings has

406jurisdiction over the subject matter of and the parties to this

417proceeding. § 120.57(1), Fla. Stat. (2009).

4236. Swamp has standing to protest the establishment of a

433new dealership because Subsection 620.342(6), Florida Statutes,

440provides that:

442(6) An existing franchised motor vehicle

448dealer or dealers shall have standing to

455protest a proposed additional or relocated

461motor vehicle dealer when the existing motor

468vehicle dealer or dealers have a franchise

475agreement for the same line-make vehicle to

482be sold or serviced by the proposed

489additional or relocated motor vehicle dealer

495and are physically located so as to meet or

504satisfy any of the following requirements or

511conditions:

512(a) If the proposed additional or relocated

519motor vehicle dealer is to be located in a

528county with a population of less than

535300,000 according to the most recent data of

544the United States Census Bureau or the data

552of the Bureau of Economic and Business

559Research of the University of Florida:

5651. The proposed additional or relocated

571motor vehicle dealer is to be located in the

580area designated or described as the area of

588responsibility, or such similarly designated

593area, including the entire area designated

599as a multiple-point area, in the franchise

606agreement or in any related document or

613commitment with the existing motor vehicle

619dealer or dealers of the same line-make as

627such agreement existed upon October 1, 1988;

6342. The existing motor vehicle dealer or

641dealers of the same line-make have a

648licensed franchise location within a radius

654of 20 miles of the location of the proposed

663additional or relocated motor vehicle

668dealer; or

6703. Any existing motor vehicle dealer or

677dealers of the same line-make can establish

684that during any 12-month period of the 36-

692month period preceding the filing of the

699licensee's application for the proposed

704dealership, the dealer or its predecessor

710made 25 percent of its retail sales of new

719motor vehicles to persons whose registered

725household addresses were located within a

731radius of 20 miles of the location of the

740proposed additional or relocated motor

745vehicle dealer; provided the existing dealer

751is located in the same county or any county

760contiguous to the county where the

766additional or relocated dealer is proposed

772to be located.

775(b) The addition or relocation of a

782service-only dealership shall not be subject

788to protest if:

7911. The applicant for the service-only

797dealership location is an existing motor

803vehicle dealer of the same line-make as the

811proposed additional or relocated service-

816only dealership;

8182. There is no existing dealer of the same

827line-make closer than the applicant to the

834proposed location of the additional or

840relocated service-only dealership; and

8443. The proposed location of the additional

851or relocated service-only dealership is at

857least 7 miles from all existing motor

864vehicle dealerships of the same line-make,

870other than motor vehicle dealerships owned

876by the applicant.

879(c) In determining whether existing

884franchised motor vehicle dealers are

889providing adequate representations in the

894community or territory for the line-make in

901question in a protest of the proposed

908addition or relocation of a service-only

914dealership, the department may consider the

920elements set forth in paragraph (2)(b),

926provided:

9271. With respect to subparagraph (2)(b)1.,

933only the impact as it relates to service may

942be considered;

9442. Subparagraph (2)(b)3. shall not be

950considered;

9513. With respect to subparagraph (2)(b)9.,

957only service facilities shall be considered;

963and

9644. With respect to subparagraph (2)(b)11.,

970only the volume of service business

976transacted shall be considered.

980(d) If an application for a service-only

987dealership is granted, the department shall

993issue a license which permits only service,

1000as defined in s. 320.60 (16), and does not

1009permit the selling or leasing of new motor

1017vehicles, as defined in s. 320.60 (15). If a

1026service-only dealership subsequently seeks

1030to sell new motor vehicles at its location,

1038the notice and protest provisions of this

1045section shall apply.

10487. Subsection 320.642(2)(a), Florida Statutes, provides

1054that once standing is established pursuant to Subsection

1062620.342(6), Florida Statutes, it is up to the applicant for a

1073license to demonstrate inadequate representation of the

1080particular make of motor vehicle in question. In this case, the

1091applicant, Moto, failed to appear, and thus failed to

1100demonstrate inadequate representation. Accordingly, Moto may

1106not be licensed as a dealer for the sale of ZHNG motorcycles.

1118RECOMMENDATION

1119Based upon the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, it

1130is

1131RECOMMENDED that the Department of Highway Safety and Motor

1140Vehicles issue a final order disapproving the establishment of

1149another ZHNG motorcycle dealership in Alachua County, Florida.

1157DONE AND ENTERED this 5th day of November, 2009, in

1167Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida.

1171S

1172HARRY L. HOOPER

1175Administrative Law Judge

1178Division of Administrative Hearings

1182The DeSoto Building

11851230 Apalachee Parkway

1188Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3060

1191(850) 488-9675

1193Fax Filing (850) 921-6847

1197www.doah.state.fl.us

1198Filed with the Clerk of the

1204Division of Administrative Hearings

1208this 5th day of November, 2009.

1214COPIES FURNISHED :

1217Jennifer Clark

1219Department of Highway Safety

1223and Motor Vehicles

1226Neil Kirkman Building, Room A-308

12312900 Apalachee Parkway

1234Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0635

1237Shawn Glasser

1239Swamp Cycles, LLC

1242633 Northwest 13th Street

1246Gainesville, Florida 32601

1249Justin Jackrel

1251Gator Moto, LLC

12547065 Northwest 22nd Street, Suite A

1260Gainesville, Florida 32653

1263Neil Aussenberg

1265Scooters Management, LLC

12686910 Renwick, Suite C

1272Houston, Texas 77081

1275Carl A. Ford, Director

1279Division of Motor Vehicles

1283Department of Highway Safety

1287and Motor Vehicles

1290Neil Kirkman Building, Room B-439

12952900 Apalachee Parkway

1298Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0500

1301Robin Lotane, General Counsel

1305Department of Highway Safety

1309and Motor Vehicles

1312Neil Kirkman Building

13152900 Apalachee Parkway

1318Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0500

1321Julia L. Jones, Executive Director

1326Department of Highway Safety

1330And Motor Vehicles

1333Neil Kirkman Building

13362900 Apalachee Parkway

1339Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0500

1342NOTICE OF RIGHT TO SUBMIT EXCEPTIONS

1348All parties have the right to submit written exceptions within

135815 days from the date of this Recommended Order. Any exceptions

1369to this Recommended Order should be filed with the agency that

1380will issue the Final Order in this case.

Select the PDF icon to view the document.
PDF
Date
Proceedings
PDF:
Date: 12/11/2009
Proceedings: Agency Final Order filed.
PDF:
Date: 12/09/2009
Proceedings: Agency Final Order
PDF:
Date: 11/05/2009
Proceedings: Recommended Order
PDF:
Date: 11/05/2009
Proceedings: Recommended Order (hearing held October 27, 2009). CASE CLOSED.
PDF:
Date: 11/05/2009
Proceedings: Recommended Order cover letter identifying the hearing record referred to the Agency.
Date: 10/27/2009
Proceedings: CASE STATUS: Hearing Held.
PDF:
Date: 07/28/2009
Proceedings: Amended Notice of Hearing (hearing set for October 27, 2009; 10:00 a.m.; Gainesville, FL; amended as to Hearing Room Venue and Location).
PDF:
Date: 07/28/2009
Proceedings: Notice of Ex-parte Communication.
PDF:
Date: 07/23/2009
Proceedings: Letter to DOAH from S. Glasser regarding request for video teleconference hearing filed.
PDF:
Date: 04/27/2009
Proceedings: Notice of Hearing (hearing set for October 27, 2009; 9:00 a.m.; Tallahassee, FL).
PDF:
Date: 04/27/2009
Proceedings: Order of Pre-hearing Instructions.
PDF:
Date: 04/15/2009
Proceedings: Initial Order.
PDF:
Date: 04/15/2009
Proceedings: Notice of Publication for a New Point Franchise Motor Vehicle Dealer filed.
PDF:
Date: 04/15/2009
Proceedings: Protest Letter of Establishment of a New Dealership filed.
PDF:
Date: 04/15/2009
Proceedings: Agency referral

Case Information

Judge:
HARRY L. HOOPER
Date Filed:
04/15/2009
Date Assignment:
04/15/2009
Last Docket Entry:
12/11/2009
Location:
Garden City, Florida
District:
Northern
Agency:
ADOPTED IN TOTO
 

Counsels

Related DOAH Cases(s) (1):

Related Florida Statute(s) (4):